On Thursday 02 March 2006 00:03, Dave Jones wrote: > On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 05:46:47PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote: > > This amused me. > > > > (17:43:34:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~)$ ll /proc/acpi/processor/ > > total 0 > > dr-xr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Mar 1 17:43 CPU1/ > > dr-xr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Mar 1 17:43 CPU2/ > > dr-xr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Mar 1 17:43 CPU3/ > > (17:43:36:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~)$ > > Digging further. I notice more oddities (or maybe I've just > misunderstood this -- corrections welcomed)
Probably related to Ashok's ACPI CPU hotplug patches. What's the full bootup log? > (17:59:02:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~)$ cat > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/topology/core_id 0 > (17:59:23:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~)$ cat > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/topology/core_id 0 > > (17:59:38:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~)$ cat > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/topology/core_siblings > 00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000001 > (17:59:47:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~)$ cat > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/topology/core_siblings > 00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000002 > > Neither of these CPUs are HT / dual-core, so shouldn't these be the same ? It looks like a standard dual socket machine. Each CPU is a sibling of its own only. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
