Ashok Raj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Local apic entries are only 8 bits, but it seemed to not be caught with
> u8 return value result in the check
>
> cpu_index >= NR_CPUS becomming always false.
>
> drivers/acpi/processor_core.c: In function `acpi_processor_get_info':
> drivers/acpi/processor_core.c:483: warning: comparison is always false due to
> limited range of data type
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> -----------------------------------------------------
> drivers/acpi/processor_core.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6.16-rc5-mm1/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.16-rc5-mm1.orig/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
> +++ linux-2.6.16-rc5-mm1/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
> @@ -395,7 +395,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_remove_fs(stru
> #define ARCH_BAD_APICID (0xff)
> #endif
>
> -static u8 convert_acpiid_to_cpu(u8 acpi_id)
> +static int convert_acpiid_to_cpu(u8 acpi_id)
> {
> u16 apic_id;
> int i;
> @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struc
> acpi_status status = 0;
> union acpi_object object = { 0 };
> struct acpi_buffer buffer = { sizeof(union acpi_object), &object };
> - u8 cpu_index;
> + int cpu_index;
> static int cpu0_initialized;
>
> ACPI_FUNCTION_TRACE("acpi_processor_get_info");
> @@ -466,7 +466,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struc
> cpu_index = convert_acpiid_to_cpu(pr->acpi_id);
>
> /* Handle UP system running SMP kernel, with no LAPIC in MADT */
> - if (!cpu0_initialized && (cpu_index == 0xff) &&
> + if (!cpu0_initialized && (cpu_index == -1) &&
> (num_online_cpus() == 1)) {
> cpu_index = 0;
> }
> @@ -480,7 +480,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struc
> * less than the max # of CPUs. They should be ignored _iff
> * they are physically not present.
> */
> - if (cpu_index >= NR_CPUS) {
> + if (cpu_index == -1) {
> if (ACPI_FAILURE
> (acpi_processor_hotadd_init(pr->handle, &pr->id))) {
> ACPI_ERROR((AE_INFO,
On a uniprocessor build this causes a crash in acpi_processor_start():
BUG_ON((pr->id >= NR_CPUS) || (pr->id < 0));
pr->id is 255.
I could bodge around this in various ways, but the semantics of cpu IDs in
there seem to be a bit opaque, and I suspect some more thought needs to go
into it all.
As well as uniprocessor testing ;)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
