At Fri, 10 Mar 2006 11:28:58 +0900, Kenji Kaneshige <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Kristen Accardi wrote: > > I notice in the acpi_bus_get_flags() function ejectable is defined as > > anything that has either _EJ0 or _EJD. However, the acpi pci hotplug > > driver defines an ejectable slot as being one which must have (among > > other things) _EJ0. Is it legitimate to change the definition of an > > ejectable slot to be one that has either _EJ0 or _EJD (in addition to > > the other requirements for pci hotplug slots). > > > > As the acpi_bus_get_flags() does, I think "ejectable device" is defined > as anything that has either _EJ0 or _EJD. But I don't think the device > is "ejectable slot" if it has _EJD but it doesn't have _EJ0. If an eject > request was notified to such devices, I don't know how to eject those. > I think one of the requirements for pci hotplug slots is having _EJ0.
I agree with Kenji's opinion. I also worry about that if an eject request is raised on the _EJD defined device. Thank, MUNE - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
