Hello.

I wrote a patch to avoid redundant memory hot-add call at boot time.
This was cause of strange fail message of memory hotplug
like "ACPI: add_memory failed".
Memory is recognized by early boot code with EFI/E820.
But, if DSDT describes memory devices for them, then hot-add
code is called for already recognized memory, and it shows fail messages
with -EEXIST.
So, sys admin will misunderstand this message as something wrong by
it.

This patch avoids them by preventing redundant hot-add call until
completion of driver initialization. 

This patch is for 2.6.19-rc2.
I tested this patch on Tiger4 with my hot-add emulation.

Please apply.

Signed-off-by: Yasunori Goto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

---
 drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c |   12 ++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)

---

Index: linux-2.6.18/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.18.orig/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c    2006-10-18 
21:12:33.000000000 +0900
+++ linux-2.6.18/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c 2006-10-18 22:50:44.000000000 
+0900
@@ -85,6 +85,8 @@
        struct list_head res_list;
 };
 
+int acpi_hotmem_initialized = 0;
+
 static acpi_status
 acpi_memory_get_resource(struct acpi_resource *resource, void *context)
 {
@@ -438,6 +440,15 @@
        struct acpi_memory_device *mem_device;
        int result = 0;
 
+       /*
+        * Early boot code has recognized memory area by EFI/E820.
+        * If DSDT shows these memory devices on boot, hotplug is not necessary
+        * for them. So, it just returns until completion of this driver's
+        * start up.
+        */
+       if (!acpi_hotmem_initialized)
+               return 0;
+
        mem_device = acpi_driver_data(device);
 
        if (!acpi_memory_check_device(mem_device)) {
@@ -537,6 +548,7 @@
                return -ENODEV;
        }
 
+       acpi_hotmem_initialized = 1;
        return 0;
 }
 


-- 
Yasunori Goto 


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to