On 8/23/06, Dmitry Torokhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/18/06, Len Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> that patch was an incremental depending on the previous patch.
> Please send just the final patch vs 2.6.18-rc4 to the above, also cc:
[email protected]
>
> > Also, Dmitry had asked what we should do about handing ACPI errors to
> > upper layers here:
> > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-acpi&m=115392091425952&w=2
>
> Dmitry has a good question and we need to iron it out for the general case.
> I recommend that for your driver you simply do something like this for now:
>
> if (ACPI_ERROR(status))
> status = -EINVAL
>
> and get your driver into the mm tree to find the next problem.
>
Jaya,
If you could make the change Len was talking about and create a patch
against mainline I would apply it to my tree.
Thank you.
--
Dmitry
Ok. Will do and post shortly.
Thanks,
jaya
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
