On Wed 2007-01-24 21:28:13, Len Brown wrote:
> On Monday 08 January 2007 08:13, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > > This patch set is against acpi-test sysfs branch which already converts
> > > ACPI to follow driver model. Now the ACPI procfs functions are
> > > duplicated in sysfs step by step. And I want the ACPI interface in sysfs
> > > works exactly the same way as in procfs.
> >
> > No, you can't port same broken interface into sysfs. Some /proc
> > interfaces are horrible, and we do not want to create _exactly same_
> > horrible interfaces in /sys.
>
> Please be specific.
/proc/acpi/alarm is horrible mess, as was detailed in another email
from David.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures)
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
