On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 22:16 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 10:04:26AM +0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-03-23 at 01:52 +0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > >
> > > It looks like the cpuidle patches are doing incorrect things
> > > with their kobject protocol.
> > Looks the goal to force kobject to be allocated dynamically is to
> > release the memory of the kobject. But in the cpuidle case, we don't
> > want to free the memory as it might be used soon.
>
> What do you mean "used soon"? Is this a time critical thing?
>
> > I saw a lot of similar staff too, like 'cpu_devices' in
> > arch/i386/kernel/topology.c.
>
> The point is that kobjects should be created dynamically as they can be
> referenced by different threads at different times, so you need to let
> it manage the reference counting logic for you. Don't create them
> statically, it's almost always wrong.
>
> Note, one valid use of static kobject is in struct bus_type and in some
> class definitions.
>
> So this should probably be fixed.
Ok, below patch should fix the issue.
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: rc4-mm1/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
===================================================================
--- rc4-mm1.orig/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c 2007-03-23 08:58:51.000000000
+0800
+++ rc4-mm1/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c 2007-03-28 09:23:24.000000000
+0800
@@ -623,7 +623,7 @@ int acpi_processor_cst_has_changed(struc
return -ENODEV;
acpi_processor_get_power_info(pr);
- return cpuidle_force_redetect(&per_cpu(cpuidle_devices, pr->id));
+ return cpuidle_force_redetect(per_cpu(cpuidle_devices, pr->id));
}
/* proc interface */
Index: rc4-mm1/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
===================================================================
--- rc4-mm1.orig/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c 2007-03-23 09:52:48.000000000
+0800
+++ rc4-mm1/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c 2007-03-28 09:22:41.000000000 +0800
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
#include "cpuidle.h"
-DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpuidle_device, cpuidle_devices);
+DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpuidle_device *, cpuidle_devices);
EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL_GPL(cpuidle_devices);
DEFINE_MUTEX(cpuidle_lock);
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ static void (*pm_idle_old)(void);
*/
static void cpuidle_idle_call(void)
{
- struct cpuidle_device *dev = &__get_cpu_var(cpuidle_devices);
+ struct cpuidle_device *dev = __get_cpu_var(cpuidle_devices);
struct cpuidle_state *target_state;
int next_state;
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ static int cpuidle_add_device(struct sys
int cpu = sys_dev->id;
struct cpuidle_device *dev;
- dev = &per_cpu(cpuidle_devices, cpu);
+ dev = per_cpu(cpuidle_devices, cpu);
mutex_lock(&cpuidle_lock);
if (cpu_is_offline(cpu)) {
@@ -125,6 +125,16 @@ static int cpuidle_add_device(struct sys
return 0;
}
+ if (!dev) {
+ dev = kzalloc(sizeof(struct cpuidle_device), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!dev) {
+ mutex_unlock(&cpuidle_lock);
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+ init_completion(&dev->kobj_unregister);
+ per_cpu(cpuidle_devices, cpu) = dev;
+ }
+
if (dev->status & CPUIDLE_STATUS_DETECTED) {
mutex_unlock(&cpuidle_lock);
return 0;
@@ -153,7 +163,7 @@ static int __cpuidle_remove_device(struc
{
struct cpuidle_device *dev;
- dev = &per_cpu(cpuidle_devices, sys_dev->id);
+ dev = per_cpu(cpuidle_devices, sys_dev->id);
if (!(dev->status & CPUIDLE_STATUS_DETECTED)) {
return 0;
@@ -166,6 +176,9 @@ static int __cpuidle_remove_device(struc
cpuidle_detach_driver(dev);
cpuidle_remove_sysfs(sys_dev);
list_del(&dev->device_list);
+ wait_for_completion(&dev->kobj_unregister);
+ per_cpu(cpuidle_devices, sys_dev->id) = NULL;
+ kfree(dev);
return 0;
}
Index: rc4-mm1/drivers/cpuidle/sysfs.c
===================================================================
--- rc4-mm1.orig/drivers/cpuidle/sysfs.c 2007-03-23 09:34:01.000000000
+0800
+++ rc4-mm1/drivers/cpuidle/sysfs.c 2007-03-28 11:45:56.000000000 +0800
@@ -210,8 +210,16 @@ static struct sysfs_ops cpuidle_sysfs_op
.store = cpuidle_store,
};
+static void cpuidle_sysfs_release(struct kobject *kobj)
+{
+ struct cpuidle_device *dev = kobj_to_cpuidledev(kobj);
+
+ complete(&dev->kobj_unregister);
+}
+
static struct kobj_type ktype_cpuidle = {
.sysfs_ops = &cpuidle_sysfs_ops,
+ .release = cpuidle_sysfs_release,
};
struct cpuidle_state_attr {
@@ -265,9 +273,15 @@ static struct sysfs_ops cpuidle_state_sy
.show = cpuidle_state_show,
};
+static void cpuidle_state_sysfs_release(struct kobject *kobj)
+{
+ /* Nothing required to do here, just workaround kobject warning*/
+}
+
static struct kobj_type ktype_state_cpuidle = {
.sysfs_ops = &cpuidle_state_sysfs_ops,
.default_attrs = cpuidle_state_default_attrs,
+ .release = cpuidle_state_sysfs_release,
};
/**
@@ -319,7 +333,7 @@ int cpuidle_add_sysfs(struct sys_device
int cpu = sysdev->id;
struct cpuidle_device *dev;
- dev = &per_cpu(cpuidle_devices, cpu);
+ dev = per_cpu(cpuidle_devices, cpu);
dev->kobj.parent = &sysdev->kobj;
dev->kobj.ktype = &ktype_cpuidle;
kobject_set_name(&dev->kobj, "%s", "cpuidle");
@@ -335,6 +349,6 @@ void cpuidle_remove_sysfs(struct sys_dev
int cpu = sysdev->id;
struct cpuidle_device *dev;
- dev = &per_cpu(cpuidle_devices, cpu);
+ dev = per_cpu(cpuidle_devices, cpu);
kobject_unregister(&dev->kobj);
}
Index: rc4-mm1/include/linux/cpuidle.h
===================================================================
--- rc4-mm1.orig/include/linux/cpuidle.h 2007-03-23 09:55:13.000000000
+0800
+++ rc4-mm1/include/linux/cpuidle.h 2007-03-28 11:32:56.000000000 +0800
@@ -89,9 +89,7 @@ struct cpuidle_device {
void *governor_data;
};
-#define to_cpuidle_device(n) container_of(n, struct cpuidle_device, kobj);
-
-DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct cpuidle_device, cpuidle_devices);
+DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct cpuidle_device *, cpuidle_devices);
/* Device Status Flags */
#define CPUIDLE_STATUS_DETECTED (0x1)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
