Hi! > > Crazy idea... could we kill hibernate_ops-like struct, and just create > > a device for ACPI, using its suspend()/resume()/whatever callbacks to > > do the ACPI magic? > > Doesn't that have the ordering problem again? You must ensure that this > sysdev is suspended as the last one, and that's currently impossible if > ACPI is modular.
I do not think acpi has these kinds of ordering requirements... (And I do not see what it has to do with module or not). -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
