On Sat, 2007-06-23 at 20:28 -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > Okay. But on non-ACPI systems, do we want to restrict the > /sys/power/state interface to sleep states? How then should the user > tell the system to go to a low-performance run state? Or should that > be handled automatically within the kernel?
The code for pasemi processors/boards has various idle loops right now that put the processor into different states with different wakeup latency, these are currently handled with a kernel parameter there. johannes
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
