On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 07:43:59PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 21:52 +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > > Andrew, regarding git-battery-vs-git-acpi.patch.. I'll merge it as > > soon as acpi related changes will hit Linus tree, would that be okay > > for you? Not that I don't like these changes, I do like them. But > > they'll break bare battery2-2.6 (based on Linus tree). Though, I can > > merge it now if that will make your living easier. > > Was anyone working on hooking up APM and ACPI to the new battery class, > btw?
Don't know of anyone yet. But lets inquire appropriate people, I don't have x86 hardware with batteries, thus I hardly can help on that matter, nor following any x86 development. Henrique de Moraes Holschuh (IBM ACPI EXTRAS maintainer) was involved in battery class review, Cc'ed. Also Cc'ing ACPI BATTERY maintainer, and linux-acpi list. Just reminder: we're talking about power supply class, its git tree is at git://git.infradead.org/users/cbou/battery2-2.6.git, you may also find it in recent -mm patchsets. Most interesting directory is drivers/power/, contains power supply class and drivers, plus header file at include/linux/power_supply.h. Also, Documentation/power_supply_class.txt exits. Thanks, -- Anton Vorontsov email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] backup email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] irc://irc.freenode.org/bd2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
