Hi!
> > yes, acpidump would be more useful than just the DSDT --
> > as we get all kinds of issues with all the tables.
> >
> > One problem is that shipping around BIOS images, particularly
> > modified ones, is sort of a touchy area. This is the code
> > of the manufacturer, who may or may not be happy that the
> > community is hacking their code. If any of those manufactureres
> > got mad at Intel for mucking with their BIOS code,
> > that would be a bad day for we Intel employees.
> >
> > lesswatts.org is hosted by Intel. So we'd need to
> > sort though this issue before adding an acpidump database.
>
> Well, we have suspend.sf.net and the acpidump database can safely be put in
> there, I think. ;-)
Agreed.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures)
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
