get_property() should not call battery_update() on absent battery to
avoid cycle and oops.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Tested-by: Rolf Eike Beer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/acpi/battery.c | 8 +++++---
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/battery.c b/drivers/acpi/battery.c
index c2ce0ad..ca37db4 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/battery.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/battery.c
@@ -140,10 +140,11 @@ static int acpi_battery_get_property(struct power_supply
*psy,
{
struct acpi_battery *battery = to_acpi_battery(psy);
- if ((!acpi_battery_present(battery)) &&
- psp != POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_PRESENT)
+ if (acpi_battery_present(battery)) {
+ /* run battery update only if it is present */
+ acpi_battery_update(battery);
+ } else if (psp != POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_PRESENT)
return -ENODEV;
- acpi_battery_update(battery);
switch (psp) {
case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_STATUS:
if (battery->state & 0x01)
@@ -457,6 +458,7 @@ static void sysfs_remove_battery(struct acpi_battery
*battery)
return;
device_remove_file(battery->bat.dev, &alarm_attr);
power_supply_unregister(&battery->bat);
+ battery->bat.dev = NULL;
}
static int acpi_battery_update(struct acpi_battery *battery)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
