On Wednesday 14 November 2007 10:06, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On 11/14/07, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 14 Nov 2007, Zhang Rui wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 00:43 +0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > > ACPI: video - properly handle errors when registering proc elements
> > > >
> > > > Have acpi_video_device_add_fs() and acpi_video_bus_add_fs()
> > > > properly unwind proc creation after error.
> > > Hi, Dmitry,
> > >
> > > The patch is good.
> > > But I'm afraid we don't need this patch while we are trying to remove
> > > the proc I/F for all ACPI device drivers.
> >
> > IMHO, until procfs is gone for good, it is best to make sure it works
> > perfectly.
> >
> 
> That is my position as well. The removal is scheduled for July 2008
> which is 9 months out.

Agreed.
While we don't want to add (and support) any new /proc features,
unwinding from errors properly with the existing features
seems like a good idea.

thanks,
-Len

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to