On Tuesday 06 November 2007 14:11, Alex Williamson wrote:
> 
>    Seems like we don't need to print a big ugly warning when osi_linux
> is already properly enabled.  Thanks,

True if "properly enabled" were not an oxymoron:-)
i need to hack on this code a bit so that it doesn't
complain when DMI or the user enabled it, but otherwise does.

thanks,
-Len

>       Alex
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> --
> 
> diff -r c7f1be4e5832 drivers/acpi/osl.c
> --- a/drivers/acpi/osl.c      Thu Nov 01 12:09:33 2007 -0700
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/osl.c      Tue Nov 06 12:08:38 2007 -0700
> @@ -1167,14 +1167,15 @@ acpi_os_validate_interface (char *interf
>       if (!strncmp(osi_additional_string, interface, OSI_STRING_LENGTH_MAX))
>               return AE_OK;
>       if (!strcmp("Linux", interface)) {
> +             if (osi_linux)
> +                     return AE_OK;
> +
>               printk(KERN_WARNING PREFIX
>                       "System BIOS is requesting _OSI(Linux)\n");
>               printk(KERN_WARNING PREFIX
>                       "If \"acpi_osi=Linux\" works better,\n"
>                       "Please send dmidecode "
>                       "to [EMAIL PROTECTED]");
> -             if(osi_linux)
> -                     return AE_OK;
>       }
>       return AE_SUPPORT;
>  }
> 
> 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to