"Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Wrap cpu_idle_wait() in an x86 #ifdef since it's x86 only.
>> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
>> index d2fabe7..4d0f9b0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
>> @@ -82,7 +82,9 @@ void cpuidle_uninstall_idle_handler(void)
>> {
>> if (enabled_devices && (pm_idle != pm_idle_old)) {
>> pm_idle = pm_idle_old;
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86
>> cpu_idle_wait();
>> +#endif
>>
>
> The archs that do not have cpu_idle_wait() and has more than one CPU
> will need something equivalent to cpu_idle_wait() to kick all other CPUs
> out of idle loop.
> The reason being we do not want another CPU to be in idle loop that is
> being uninstalled here.
>
> Do you have more than one logical CPU on your platform?
No, I'm testing on a UP ARM-based platform (TI OMAP.)
Maybe #ifdef CONFIG_SMP is the right thing instead of #ifdef
CONFIG_X86?
Kevin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
