applied.
thanks,
-len
On Thursday 31 January 2008 20:35, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Show C1 idle time in /sysfs cpuidle interface. C1 idle time may not
> be entirely accurate in all cases. It includes the time spent
> in the interrupt handler after wakeup with "hlt" based C1. But, it will
> be accurate with "mwait" based C1.
>
> Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Index: linux-2.6.25-rc/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.25-rc.orig/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
> +++ linux-2.6.25-rc/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
> @@ -1382,8 +1382,10 @@ static inline void acpi_idle_do_entry(st
> static int acpi_idle_enter_c1(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
> struct cpuidle_state *state)
> {
> + u32 t1, t2;
> struct acpi_processor *pr;
> struct acpi_processor_cx *cx = cpuidle_get_statedata(state);
> +
> pr = processors[smp_processor_id()];
>
> if (unlikely(!pr))
> @@ -1393,12 +1395,14 @@ static int acpi_idle_enter_c1(struct cpu
> if (pr->flags.bm_check)
> acpi_idle_update_bm_rld(pr, cx);
>
> + t1 = inl(acpi_gbl_FADT.xpm_timer_block.address);
> acpi_idle_do_entry(cx);
> + t2 = inl(acpi_gbl_FADT.xpm_timer_block.address);
>
> local_irq_enable();
> cx->usage++;
>
> - return 0;
> + return ticks_elapsed_in_us(t1, t2);
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -1632,6 +1636,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_setup_cpuidle(
> switch (cx->type) {
> case ACPI_STATE_C1:
> state->flags |= CPUIDLE_FLAG_SHALLOW;
> + state->flags |= CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIME_VALID;
> state->enter = acpi_idle_enter_c1;
> dev->safe_state = state;
> break;
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
