Linux-Advocacy Digest #646, Volume #33 Mon, 16 Apr 01 17:13:07 EDT
Contents:
Re: OT: Treason (was Re: Communism) (Chad Everett)
Re: OT: Treason (was Re: Communism) (Roberto Alsina)
Re: Blame it all on Microsoft (Bernd Paysan)
Re: there's always a bigger fool ("Kelsey Bjarnason")
Re: Crimosoft will get off scot-free (Tim Hanson)
Re: OT: Treason (was Re: Communism) (Roberto Alsina)
Re: hmm getting tired of this! (Fred K Ollinger)
Re: hmm getting tired of this! (Fred K Ollinger)
Re: hmm getting tired of this! (Fred K Ollinger)
Re: Why left-wing communist assholes hate Reagan. (was Re: Communism, ("Aaron R.
Kulkis")
Re: Col. Hack (MjM)
Re: Communism, Communist propagandists in the US...still..to this day. ("Aaron R.
Kulkis")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chad Everett)
Crossposted-To: alt.destroy.microsoft,us.military.army,soc.singles
Subject: Re: OT: Treason (was Re: Communism)
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 16 Apr 2001 14:49:57 -0500
On 16 Apr 2001 18:33:35 GMT, Roberto Alsina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Chad Everett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>On 16 Apr 2001 12:20:25 GMT, Roberto Alsina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>Matthew 26:
>>>
>>>26: While they were eating, Jesus took bread, gave thanks and broke it,
>>> and gave it to his disciples, saying, "Take and eat; this is my body."
>>>27 Then he took the cup, gave thanks and offered it to them, saying,
>>> "Drink from it, all of you.28 This is my blood of the covenant, which
>>> is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins.
>>>
>>
>>
>>Thank you for proving my point and for providing that wonderful Bible passage.
>>That's not quite what you said, now is it?
>
>Actually, it pretty much is. I said "he ased his fellows to drink the wine
>that is his blood".
>
>Here he says to his disciples (his fellows) "drink from [this wine] all of
>you. This is my blood"
>
See, there you go again. No he didn't. Matthew quotes him as saying:
"Drink from it [ the cup ], all of you.28 This is my blood of the covenant,
which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins." He, of course,
was referring to the cup ("drink from it"), as in when he later asks God:
"if it be your will, take this cup from me".
>I'd say it was close enough for government work. Yet you said Jesus didn't
>say that.
Maybe your government. But that's another topic.
>>I don't see anywhere in that passage where Jesus says that drinking wine on
>>Sundays expresses love for him.
>
>What day was it[1]? What was the purpose of drinking it?
>
It was the eve of the passover which was Thursday night (Friday depending on
who you talk to). He asked that they do this in "remembrance of me" and said
to do it as often as they ate and drank.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roberto Alsina)
Crossposted-To: alt.destroy.microsoft,us.military.army,soc.singles
Subject: Re: OT: Treason (was Re: Communism)
Date: 16 Apr 2001 20:08:41 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chad Everett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 16 Apr 2001 18:33:35 GMT, Roberto Alsina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>Chad Everett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>On 16 Apr 2001 12:20:25 GMT, Roberto Alsina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>Matthew 26:
>>>>
>>>>26: While they were eating, Jesus took bread, gave thanks and broke it,
>>>> and gave it to his disciples, saying, "Take and eat; this is my body."
>>>>27 Then he took the cup, gave thanks and offered it to them, saying,
>>>> "Drink from it, all of you.28 This is my blood of the covenant, which
>>>> is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Thank you for proving my point and for providing that wonderful Bible passage.
>>>That's not quite what you said, now is it?
>>
>>Actually, it pretty much is. I said "he ased his fellows to drink the wine
>>that is his blood".
>>
>>Here he says to his disciples (his fellows) "drink from [this wine] all of
>>you. This is my blood"
>>
>
>See, there you go again. No he didn't. Matthew quotes him as saying:
>"Drink from it [ the cup ]
What was in the cup?
>, all of you.28 This is my blood of the covenant,
>which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins." He, of course,
>was referring to the cup ("drink from it"), as in when he later asks God:
>"if it be your will, take this cup from me".
So, you say that the important thing was not drinking, but drinking
from a specific cup?
>>>I don't see anywhere in that passage where Jesus says that drinking wine on
>>>Sundays expresses love for him.
>>
>>What day was it[1]? What was the purpose of drinking it?
>>
>
>It was the eve of the passover which was Thursday night (Friday depending on
>who you talk to).
Isn't passover always a sunday? And Jewish tradition ends the days at
sunset, so "the night before" actually means passover.
> He asked that they do this in "remembrance of me" and said
>to do it as often as they ate and drank.
Oh, but if the important thing was not drinking but drinking from
a specific cup, how could they do it?
--
Roberto Alsina (who finds this amusing)
------------------------------
From: Bernd Paysan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.theory,comp.arch,comp.object
Subject: Re: Blame it all on Microsoft
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2001 21:34:21 +0200
Michael Ash wrote:
> >Microsoft has no equivalent of AMD or Transmeta.
>
> Ironic that you'd mention Transmeta, given that what is probably MS's
> largest competitor was created by someone who now works for them.
Is it? Linux can be a replacement for Windows, if you also replace most
of your apps (only few run on both systems). Linux is not compatible
with Windows, it is like Alpha, MIPS, or PowerPC to Intel, not like AMD
or Transmeta to Intel.
--
Bernd Paysan
"If you want it done right, you have to do it yourself"
http://www.jwdt.com/~paysan/
------------------------------
From: "Kelsey Bjarnason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.destroy.microsoft,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,soc.singles
Subject: Re: there's always a bigger fool
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 20:24:50 GMT
[snips]
"mmnnoo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:xyaC6.16137$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> The real reason you're asked to close all other programs
> and reboot after installing is because installshield scripts
> default to that behavior.
And in some cases, with good reason. IS 5.x and MS Outlook had some _nasty_
interactions which actually didn't stop your installs from happening, as I
recal, but did make them take a hell of a long time.
> Of course not all reboots
> can be blamed on that.
No, but the "close all programs" and the reboot issue aren't necessarily
even related.
> For some reason genuine MS
> products don't use installshield and generally require
> at least 2 reboots. I just installed office 2000 on
> WinNT at work. 2 reboots per machine. WHAT?
I can think of one reason; O2K uses MSI, and you may not have had the MSI
support under NT yet, or may have had an older version. That would
definitely require one reboot. Once that's done and the actual install of
the product starts, it could well require updating a system file or two,
which could require another reboot.
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 13:27:04 -0700
From: Tim Hanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: alt.destroy.microsoft,alt.microsoft.sucks
Subject: Re: Crimosoft will get off scot-free
"T. Max Devlin" wrote:
>
> Said Johnny Neutron in alt.destroy.microsoft on Thu, 05 Apr 2001
> 01:34:59 GMT;
> >"Tim Hanson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> >> Well folks, my agency just got done sending $120m to Redmond for Windows
> >> Evewywhewe.
>
> How many people are employed by your agency?
>
> --
> T. Max Devlin
> *** The best way to convince another is
> to state your case moderately and
> accurately. - Benjamin Franklin ***
120,000, give or take.
--
"Why isn't there a special name for the tops of your feet?"
-- Lily Tomlin
______________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Still Only $9.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
With Seven Servers In California And Texas - The Worlds Uncensored News Source
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roberto Alsina)
Crossposted-To: alt.destroy.microsoft,us.military.army,soc.singles
Subject: Re: OT: Treason (was Re: Communism)
Date: 16 Apr 2001 20:33:29 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ok, I got tired, so I will hereby provide the evidence Chad requested.
I had said:
>>>>>>>On 14 Apr 2001 17:46:36 GMT, Roberto Alsina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>In 3000BC, the standard included massive rape of the women of the defeated
>>>>>>>>and mass sacrifices of the defeated soldiers.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Well that's not true at all.
And since Chad seems to take the Bible seriously, I suppose it's as good
a source as any.
In particular, Numbers 31:
7 And they warred against the Midianites, as the LORD commanded Moses;
and they slew all the males.
Anyone who has studied war will tell you that it's impossible to kill
every man in an army in combat, and that many must have been killed
after being defeated: "mass sacrifices of the defeated soldiers".
Also:
12 And they brought the captives, and the prey, and the spoil, unto
Moses, and Eleazar the priest, and unto the congregation of the children
of Israel, unto the camp at the plains of Moab, which are by Jordan near
Jericho.
Such "spoil" consisted of every one that was not killed, every woman and
child.
15 And Moses said unto them, Have ye saved all the women alive?
Apparently they had.
16 Behold, these caused the children of Israel, through the counsel of Balaam,
to commit trespass against the LORD in the matter of Peor, and there was a
plague among the congregation of the LORD.
Here, apparently God said not to just kill every man, but he even got mad
because all women and children were spared.
17 Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman
that hath known man by lying with him.
Ok, I didn't include mass assasination of defenseless women and children,
but consider it just an oversight.
18 But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him,
keep alive for yourselves.
Now, if you tell a murdering mob that they can keep every virgin alive for
themselves, what do you think that means? Massive rape of the defeated
women. Those who were not slaughtered while imprisoned, of course.
Now, apparently the standard of behaviour expected by go in battle is
a bit harsher than the current one, and he seems to get pretty mad when
the armies get soft on him.
So, anyone using the argument of "war is allowed by god" should keep
in mind that not ANY war is allowed by him, but that he prefers those where
every male of the losing side is killed, along with most women and children.
How anyone can be a literalist, and believe that an entity that gave such
commands is worth adoring is beyond me. I say, if this is god, then god
can fuck himself. Since he is supposedly omnipotent, he should be able to.
> Show us an example in 3000BC where
>>>>>>>massive rape of the defeated women occurred. Since you throw
>>>>>>>out such blatantly false statements as fact, everything you
>>>>>>>say is questionable.
Always happy to serve.
--
Roberto Alsina
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fred K Ollinger)
Subject: Re: hmm getting tired of this!
Date: 16 Apr 2001 20:33:34 GMT
Matthew Gardiner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: So, in otherwords, they over employeed and they first set up in the US,
: now they are just rationalising there business. Hmm, so, Microsofties
: have no basis of using SuSE as the "Linux Failure Poster Child".
: Matthew Gardiner
If someone thinks that linux 'failed' b/c of one buisness then they don't get
it. It's a paradigm shift people. If you apply an old paradigm to a new idea
you get nonsense. The buisness failed, but the os lives on. Now if MS went
under then there goes the OS. Unless the jackbooted thugs open source it.
God, jackbooted thug sounds so cool, btw. Where can I get some jackboots. :)
Fred
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fred K Ollinger)
Subject: Re: hmm getting tired of this!
Date: 16 Apr 2001 20:36:37 GMT
Karel Jansens ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: Darin Johnson wrote:
: >
: > "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: >
: > > Anybody who claims to have "proved" Global warming is a fraud.
: >
: > And anyone who claims it doesn't exist is also a fraud! Both sides
: > should have lots of fraudness in common.
: As far as I can tell, global warming is indeed a fact.
I agree, I mean who are you going to believe, a science publication like
Nature or self-serving propaganda? I don't think that it's a question
of global warming or no, but how much and how it's going to affect us.
Here in PA, the weather will be warmer, NJ will go under a bit so the
beach will be closer. In places like TX they will bake esp when the price
of power goes up as well. Huge AC bills. Ha-ha.
Fred
: As to what _causes_ it, a whole lot of BS-sing is going on. [*]
: --
: Regards,
: Karel Jansens
: ==============================================================
: "You're the weakest link. Goodb-No, wait! Stop! Noaaarrghh!!!"
: ==============================================================
: [*] "Nobody knows," is the right answer, but you don't get research
: grants for such statements.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fred K Ollinger)
Subject: Re: hmm getting tired of this!
Date: 16 Apr 2001 20:41:34 GMT
Brent R ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: Making a blanket statement like Americans like big houses and like to
: heat them excessively is just silly. There is a tendency for Americans
True. However, the average size of the house in the US has ballooned
since the '70's.
: to like unnecessarily big things, which I would agree is stupid, but
: that's their personal preference... and if they have the buying power to
It's pretty funny when you put it this way.
: pay for the heating then they can have big houses. Although I would find
: that to be a waste of money.
Actually this is usually debt spending so they really don't have the money,
nor will they ever b/c the bigger your debt now, the smaller the spending
power will be over your life b/c of all the money going to interest.
: As for the heating thing... I'm not sure where you're coming from. Is
: that a statistic or just a result of an assumption you made based on the
: few token US households you visited when you came here? I suspect the
: latter... unless you managed to visit more than 100,000 houses or so
: (enough to make a reasoned assumption on the heating tendencies of the
: US).
True enough, most of my room mates make it too cold for me. I adjusted.
Fred
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
misc.survivalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.singles,alt.society.liberalism,talk.politics.guns
Subject: Re: Why left-wing communist assholes hate Reagan. (was Re: Communism,
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 16:41:45 -0400
Mathew wrote:
>
> On Sun, 15 Apr 2001, Aaron R. Kulkis wrote:
>
> > "Joseph T. Adams" wrote:
> > >
> > > In comp.os.linux.advocacy The Ghost In The Machine
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > : I am not aware of Reagan's racism; is there something I'm missing?
> > > : The main campaign themes I remember are "It's Morning [Again]
> > > : In America".
> > >
> > > According to left-wing communist assholes, anyone who tries to
> > > dismantle or reform any important part of the welfare state is not
> > > only eeeevil, bur racist, because left-wing communist assholes want us
> > > to believe they're the only ones who can "help" poor Black and
> > > Hispanic people, and that without this "help," they could not possibly
> > > survive.
> > >
> > > Of course this "help" makes those who are being "helped" more
> > > dependent upon Massa (rich mostly-white liberal assholes), and less
> > > dependent upon themselves, making the problem much worse instead of
> > > better. The obvious and predictable result is that Massa gains more
> > > and more power while poor minority Citizens find themselves with less
> > > and less.
> > >
> > > The Black ghetto is the one place where left-wing communist assholes
> > > have had almost unchallenged power for 40 years now. It's now more
> > > poor, more degraded, more self-destructive, and more violent than it
> > > ever has been, and even during the upswings of a business cycle, when
> > > things improve almost everyplace else, they never improve for the
> > > people trapped in the ghetto. The best thing that ever happens to
> > > people there is that they escape to some other place where there is at
> > > least minimal safety and rule of law.
> > >
> > > Reagan wanted to dismantle the welfare state as quickly as possible
> > > while restoring the rule of law (including basic protection of life
> > > and property, something that has been lacking in inner cities ever
> > > since liberal communist assholes took power) so that people would be
> > > empowered to build and attend safe schools, learn job skills, enter
> > > the mainstream economy, start businesses, and accumulate savings,
> > > homes, and other forms of capital, all through their OWN efforts.
> > >
> > > Left-wing communist assholes never forgave him for that, but the
> > > millions of Black and Hispanic Americans who entered the middle and
> > > upper classes during his watch will always be grateful.
> > >
> > > BTW: although I'm white, I grew up in an inner city during this same
> > > time period, and I'm one of those who was able to escape poverty and
> > > become financially comfortable for the same reasons as did many Black,
> > > Hispanic and other minority Americans. So I too owe much to Reagan
> > > and to other Republicans whose tax cuts and other economic reforms,
> > > derided by the left as only benefiting the wealthy, allowed me and
> > > millions of others to escape poverty and become comfortable through
> > > our own efforts.
> > >
> > > I do think there are a lot of evil racist bastards running around.
> >
> > Throughout our country's history, The overwhelming majority of
> > the most evil racists have been Democrats...and, as you described
> > above...this is true right up until the present.
> >
> > What the fuck would Democrats do if blacks were educated and could
> > provide for themselves?
>
> Let them move in to Republican neighborhoods,so they could be closer to the
> people who really have love them.
Very true.
Demoncrooks want to keep blacks uneducated and poor, so that the
malignant racists can keep blacks far, far away from their own
neighborhoods.
Look at Palm Beach, Florida.
LOTS AND LOTS AND LOTS of rich Demoncrooks. There's only ONE club
on the Island which allows blacks to even enter, let alone be members.
And WHO owns this club, the ONLY one which allows blacks to be members?
Donald Trump...who is...a Republican.
>
> >
> >
> >
> > > But I don't think Reagan was one of them. If it were up to him, or to
> > > others of like mind (myself obviously included, on this point at
> > > least), we wouldn't *need* a welfare state, and we wouldn't need
> > > liberal communist assholes either. Actually, if it were up to me, I'd
> > > go a bit farther. I'd have a few of them (the liberal communist
> > > assholes, NOT the people they're trying to "help") tried for their
> > > heinous crimes against humanity, and punished very publicly if
> > > convicted, as an encouragement to the rest of them to stop conspiring
> > > against the rights of honest and peaceful American Citizens of all
> > > races, creeds, and colors.
> >
> > Damned straight. Remember, Klinton committed treason. And there's
> > no statute of limitations.
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Joe
> > >
> > > P.S. I don't agree with Reagan's "War on Drugs" though. He
> > > probably didn't realize that it would be used as a pretext
> > > to further erode the rights of minority and all other
> > > Americans, and even by members of his own administration
> > > to short-circuit the reform process in many Central and
> > > South American countries. I don't for one second believe
> > > that Reagan had a racist bone in his body. But the "Drug
> > > War" did have some very racist effects. And sadly it has
> > > the misguided support of most Americans in both parties,
> > > including even a large percentage of Black Americans. This
> > > is probably the only major flaw I can see in what was
> > > otherwise by far the best Presidency in my lifetime.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Aaron R. Kulkis
> > Unix Systems Engineer
> > DNRC Minister of all I survey
> > ICQ # 3056642
> >
> > L: This seems to have reduced my spam. Maybe if everyone does it we
> > can defeat the email search bots. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > K: Truth in advertising:
> > Left Wing Extremists Charles Schumer and Donna Shalala,
> > Black Seperatist Anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan,
> > Special Interest Sierra Club,
> > Anarchist Members of the ACLU
> > Left Wing Corporate Extremist Ted Turner
> > The Drunken Woman Killer Ted Kennedy
> > Grass Roots Pro-Gun movement,
> >
> >
> > J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
> > The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
> > also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
> >
> > I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
> > challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
> > between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
> > Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
> >
> > H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
> > premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
> > you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
> > you are lazy, stupid people"
> >
> > G: Knackos...you're a retard.
> >
> >
> > F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
> > adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
> >
> > E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
> > her behavior improves.
> >
> > D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
> > ...despite (C) above.
> >
> > C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
> >
> > B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
> > method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
> > direction that she doesn't like.
> >
> > A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
> >
> >
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
L: This seems to have reduced my spam. Maybe if everyone does it we
can defeat the email search bots. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
K: Truth in advertising:
Left Wing Extremists Charles Schumer and Donna Shalala,
Black Seperatist Anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan,
Special Interest Sierra Club,
Anarchist Members of the ACLU
Left Wing Corporate Extremist Ted Turner
The Drunken Woman Killer Ted Kennedy
Grass Roots Pro-Gun movement,
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
------------------------------
From: MjM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Col. Hack
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 13:43:57 -0700
Pedro Coto wrote:
>
<snip>
>
>
> I bet that any kernel developer would easily be able to create either a
> patch
> or a driver for a Windows system,
I must be missing something here. How is 'any kernel developer' going
to create a kernel patch for Windows without access to the source code?
> so again if something is not supported at
> the kernel level, you're stuck too at GNU/Linux, that's what you get.
>
That's just the POINT of my post. With Linux, you have full access to
the kernel source - you are NOT stuck with it as it is.
> > Bill decides you shouldn't be able to make a Fair-Use copy of a DVD you
> > bought? TOO BAD! Let me repeat: YOU CAN'T RECOMPILE ANY WINDOWS
> > KERNEL. You CAN'T DO ANYTHING that Bill has decided you shouldn't be
> > able to do.
>
> False. There have been binary patches for Windows, as well as registry
> tricks since
> its creation. A good programmer can do it either under Windows or under
> GNU/Linux,
> it is just that under GNU/Linux he/she's got for free the development tools.
I did a quick search for "Windows kernel patch" in Google. I got back
172k hits, the first two with Microsoft URLs and the rest (that I looked
at) were Linux kernel patch items. Where are all the 'binary patches'
for Windows which are NOT supported or created by Microsoft?
MjM
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
misc.survivalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.singles,alt.society.liberalism,talk.politics.guns
Subject: Re: Communism, Communist propagandists in the US...still..to this day.
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 16:42:54 -0400
Mathew wrote:
>
> On Sun, 15 Apr 2001, Aaron R. Kulkis wrote:
>
> > Mathew wrote:
> > >
> > > On 15 Apr 2001, Joseph T. Adams wrote:
> > >
> > > > In comp.os.linux.advocacy Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > : Let's take a nice, Glen "Sliverdick" Yeadon style pure-democratic vote:
> > > >
> > > > : All for putting Glen "Sliverdick" Yeadon up against the wall, and
> > > > : filling him full of lead, say "AYE!" All opposed, say "NAY"
> > > >
> > > > : Let's see how much Sliverdick likes democracy now.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I would vote for giving him a fair trial first, and a punishment that
> > > > is lawful and commensurate with his crimes, when and if convicted.
> > > >
> > > > We should not abandon our principles just because our enemies don't
> > > > have any. If we did, we'd be no better than they are.
> > > >
> > > > But never fear. Tyrants and would-be tyrants almost always suffer
> > > > from one fatal character flaw - arrogance - that invariably proves to
> > > > be their own undoing.
> > >
> > > Hopefully Aaron's arrogance will not do him in.
> >
> > I'm only arrogant to those who are arrogant.
> >
> > Case in point: YOU, Mathew.
> Hehehehe
> Surely you jest.
No, I'm serious.
And don't call me shirley.
> Tell me what I have been arrogant about.
Your ignorance is the basis of your arrogance.
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
L: This seems to have reduced my spam. Maybe if everyone does it we
can defeat the email search bots. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
K: Truth in advertising:
Left Wing Extremists Charles Schumer and Donna Shalala,
Black Seperatist Anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan,
Special Interest Sierra Club,
Anarchist Members of the ACLU
Left Wing Corporate Extremist Ted Turner
The Drunken Woman Killer Ted Kennedy
Grass Roots Pro-Gun movement,
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list by posting to comp.os.linux.advocacy.
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Advocacy Digest
******************************
