Linux-Advocacy Digest #603, Volume #34           Fri, 18 May 01 17:13:02 EDT

Contents:
  Re: Justice Department LOVES Microsoft! (Rick)
  Re: Why Linux Is no threat to Windows domination of the desktop (Ray Fischer)
  Re: Linux in Retail & Hospitality - What Every Retailer Should Know (Fred K Ollinger)
  Re: Why Linux Is no threat to Windows domination of the desktop (Ray Fischer)
  Re: Why Linux Is no threat to Windows domination of the desktop (Ray Fischer)
  Re: Why Linux Is no threat to Windows domination of the desktop (Ray Fischer)
  Re: To Erik: What is Wordperfect missing? ("~�~")
  Re: Why Linux Is no threat to Windows domination of the desktop (Ray Fischer)
  Re: Why Linux Is no threat to Windows domination of the desktop (3/107) (Anonymous)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Rick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: 
comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy
Subject: Re: Justice Department LOVES Microsoft!
Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 17:03:11 -0400

Daniel Johnson wrote:
> 
> "Rick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Daniel Johnson wrote:
> > > > Thats total bullshit. People buy Windows machines because..."everyone
> > > > else has them"
> > >
> > > You are very sure of that. But I don't believe it;
> >
> > Of cpourse not. You are the one that reads quotes from m$ execs and then
> > says... aw, that's not what they meant. You cant seem to see anything
> > but your point of view.
> 
> I usually say: "That's not what they said", actually.
> 

You  totally disregard direct quotes.

> > > I think the conventional wisdom still applies:
> > > it's the apps users care about.
> >
> > And what do these apps run on? window$. By micro$oft - who stole the
> > marketplace.
> 
> You are very good at typing "stole". You get
> a lot of practice. :D
> 

They stole the market place.

> But the reason Windows is so successful is because
> the apps run on it.
> 

Developers write the apps, becasue windows is the dominant OS. ANd m$
stole the marketplace to get to their position.

> [snip]
> > > Well, I'm a wintroll. But the users buying
> > > Windows computers are being completely
> > > rational.
> >
> > Yeah. They buy what everyone else has.
> 
> ... for good and sensible reasons! :D
> 

becasue window$ is the dominant OS. Its what "everyone else" has. And m$
stole the marketplace.

> [snip]
> > > > No, its because m$ stole the marketplace.
> > >
> > > Developers don't need to care much about
> > > that.
> >
> > Well genius, why do you think there's not much app development going on
> > for Commodre 64/128, Apple II, Tandy Color Computer, Atari ST, etc?
> 
> Well, The first 5 machines listed there are 8-bit
> computers- first generation PCs, and they really
> really really suck hard compared to even the
> original IBM PC.
> 

Thats crap. When the PC came out it was unfavorably compared with
Tandy's CP/M machines... but since no one was ever fired for buying
IBM... and the PC was running M$-DO$...

> Really. The IBM PC won because it wasn't
> just better than its competitors at the time,
> it was a *lot* better.
> 

BWahahahhahahhaha... ahahahahhahahhah. You're very funny at time.

> The Atari ST is the only 16 bit machine
> you have there, and of course it came
> after the PC. (The older 8-bit Ataris
> were the Atari 400 and the Atari 800).
> 
> It failed because it was too little, too late-
> and even more because Atari showed
> little commitment to it. Besides, it was
> a rather me-too-ish sort of computer. Why
> bother with it in the face of the Macintosh,
> the PC AT or the Amiga?
> 
> > Becasue no one buys the apps. Developers develop for the primary market
> > place. Which is micro$oft - who stole the market.
> 
> You wouldn't buy the apps either if you had
> ever used them. Those computers can't support
> halfway decent apps.
> 

They could support great apps at the time. I was using Appleworks with 1
meg of memory when the DOS world thought 640k was all teh memory you
needed.

> Not even as well as DOS did. They made
> DOS look really good, actually.
> 
> On those old 8-bit machines, you pretty much
> had to develop anything significant in assembly;
> high-level languages would produce code that
> was just too big or just too slow (usually both).
> 
> And assembly on a 6502 or a Z80 is not
> exactly a fun thing. 8 bit registers really,
> really bite. You pretty much always need
> bigger numbers than that, so you wind up
> having to play with carry bits and string
> arithmeitc operations together and...
> 

YEah. right. sidestep. Throw up some dust. 

> ... well, better you should use an abacus.
> 
> > > Consider how long it took game developers
> > > to get with Microsoft's program. They stuck
> > > to DOS because they could make better games
> > > that way, and they knew perfectly well
> > > that the users would follow.
> >
> > but they ... stuck... with ...micro$oft.
> 
> DOS, not necessarily MS-DOS.
> 

M4-DO$

> MS wanted everyone to move to Windows,
> but the mere prevelance of Windows didn't
> do it- it didn't make game developers
> switch.
> 
> Game developers were like other developers-
> they switched when switching would allow
> them to produce a more competitive product,
> and only then.

... a competitive product made by ... micro$oft.

-- 
Rick

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ray Fischer)
Crossposted-To: soc.men,soc.singles,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Why Linux Is no threat to Windows domination of the desktop
Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 21:01:30 GMT

Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Ray Fischer wrote:
>> Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >jet wrote:
>> >> Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>> >> > Ray Fischer wrote:

>> >> > > http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pubs/faq/faq21.htm
>> >> > >
>> >> > >     Can I get HIV from having vaginal sex?
>> >> > >
>> >> > >     Yes, it is possible to become infected with HIV through vaginal
>> >> > >     intercourse. In fact, it is the most common way the virus is
>> >> > >     transmitted in much of the world.  HIV can be found in the blood,
>> >> > >     semen, pre-seminal fluid, or vaginal fluid of a person infected
>> >> > >     with the virus. The lining of the vagina can tear and possibly
>> >> > >     allow HIV to enter the body.  Direct absorption of HIV through
>> >> > >     the mucous membranes that line the vagina also is a possibility.
>> >> > >
>> >> > >     The male may be at less risk for HIV transmission than the female
>> >> > >     through vaginal intercourse. However, HIV can enter the body of the
>> >> > >     male through his urethra (the opening at the tip of the penis) or
>> >> > >     through small cuts or open sores on the penis.
>> >> >
>> >> > Blood pressure prevents this.
>> >>
>> >> Blood comes out of the urethra?
>> >
>> >No..it keeps the urethra tightly closed until forced open by exiting semen.
>> 
>> I think I've discovered the problem.
>> 
>> Kulkis doesn't actually have a penis or he's never had and erection or
>> ejaculation.  He hasn't a clue.
>
>you're obviously unaware of the fact that the urethra is COLLAPSED
>unless forced open.

I guess you know better than all those experts who report to the US CDC.
The just deal with the real world, where real men die of real AIDS
after having real vaginal intercourse with real women.  They don't
live in Kulkis world where everything must conform to whatever bigoty
Kulkis needs to justify.


-- 
Ray Fischer         When you look long into an abyss, the abyss also looks 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  into you  --  Nietzsche

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fred K Ollinger)
Subject: Re: Linux in Retail & Hospitality - What Every Retailer Should Know
Date: 18 May 2001 21:03:00 GMT

Peter =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=F6hlmann?= ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: begin  Jon Johansan wrote:
: > 
: > "Richard Thrippleton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
: > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
: > 
: >> <snip; your HTML sucks>
: > 
: > Really - could be your reader sucks? Cause it looks perfectly formatted to
: > me.
: > 

I could create my own secret format and post that, to people who don't have it 
and then laugh at them when they can't read it.  It would be either rude,
or ignorant, but it wouldn't mean that their choices were bad if they stuck
to open standards.

Fred

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ray Fischer)
Crossposted-To: soc.men,soc.singles,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Why Linux Is no threat to Windows domination of the desktop
Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 21:03:19 GMT

Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Ray Fischer wrote:

>> >> http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pubs/faq/faq21.htm
>> >>
>> >>     Can I get HIV from having vaginal sex?
>> >>
>> >>     Yes, it is possible to become infected with HIV through vaginal
>> >>     intercourse. In fact, it is the most common way the virus is
>> >>     transmitted in much of the world.  HIV can be found in the blood,
>> >>     semen, pre-seminal fluid, or vaginal fluid of a person infected
>> >>     with the virus. The lining of the vagina can tear and possibly
>> >>     allow HIV to enter the body.  Direct absorption of HIV through
>> >>     the mucous membranes that line the vagina also is a possibility.
>> >>
>> >>     The male may be at less risk for HIV transmission than the female
>> >>     through vaginal intercourse. However, HIV can enter the body of the
>> >>     male through his urethra (the opening at the tip of the penis) or
>> >>     through small cuts or open sores on the penis.
>> >
>> >Blood pressure prevents this.
>> 
>> And obviously you know better than the US CDC.
>
>Notice that the CDC doesn't mention whether its M -> F infection,
>or F -> M infection.

Notice that Kulkis is actually incapable of reading anything which
contradicts his cherished bigotry.

copied from just above ...

    However, HIV can enter the body of the male through his urethra 
    (the opening at the tip of the penis) or through small cuts or 
    open sores on the penis.


-- 
Ray Fischer         When you look long into an abyss, the abyss also looks 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  into you  --  Nietzsche

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ray Fischer)
Crossposted-To: soc.men,soc.singles,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Why Linux Is no threat to Windows domination of the desktop
Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 21:03:58 GMT

Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Ray Fischer wrote:
>> Rich Soyack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >"Ray Fischer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message

>> >> >> > and I haven't had a blood transfusion since
>> >> >> >1973 (if at all -- appendix operation)...
>> >> >>
>> >> >> But those $10 hookers...
>> >> >
>> >> >False premise #1: that I use hookers
>> >> >False premise #2: that men can get AIDS from women in normal vaginal sex.
>> >>
>> >> That's how it spreads in most of the world, dimwit.  Through
>> >> heterosexual intercourse.
>> >
>> >But the most common vector is not vaginal sex but anal sex,
>> 
>> Wrong.  AIDS worldwide is usually spread by vaginal sex.
>
>You keep telling yourself that, heterophobe.
>
>for MEN, it only goes through male/male anal sex, and IV drug use.

Even though the United States Centers for Disease Control says
otherwise.

-- 
Ray Fischer         When you look long into an abyss, the abyss also looks 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  into you  --  Nietzsche

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ray Fischer)
Crossposted-To: soc.men,soc.singles,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Why Linux Is no threat to Windows domination of the desktop
Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 21:04:24 GMT

Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>jet wrote:
>> Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message

>> > You guys STILL have yet to demonstrate that homosexuality is
>> > anything OTHER than defective behavior.
>> 
>> Defective in what way?
>
>nonproductive

How many children do you have?

-- 
Ray Fischer         When you look long into an abyss, the abyss also looks 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  into you  --  Nietzsche

------------------------------

From: "~�~" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: To Erik: What is Wordperfect missing?
Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 21:05:03 GMT


"Terry Porter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...

> >> Just imported a Access table into Pardox without any problems. Quattro
> >> Pro is handling MS Excel with any formatting issues, and Wordperfect is
> >> as stable as the pope. Please, yet again I stress, where are the
> >> so-called features that MS Office has that Wordperfect hasn't.
> >
> > Not to get into a pissing match over features here,
>
> You're not succeeding are you ?

I don't do pissing matches.

> > but uh, it's obvious
> > that your spreadsheet doesn't have anything in the beyond standard
formulas.
>
> Oh I dunno.
> His spreadsheet has remote GUI, stability and is probably free.

You get what you pay for.

> > It couldn't have:
> > VBA macros
> > OLE
> > Excel Pivot tables
> > Complex 'what if' scenarios
> > I could go on and on ..
>
> Allow me :)
> It also couldn't have BSOD's, XP, the BSA, and it cost you a bundle
> unless like many Windows users, you *stole* it.

It always amazes me the number of BSOD's you LinPerts have when I've had
less than 6 or 7 in years --all due to hardware problems. I didn't steal
Office 97, I bought it, and it's registered.
I beta test XP, so I won't spend a dime for it. Whether I'll actually use it
depends on many factors, but the fact remains that I'll have a perfectly
legal copy when and if I decide to do so.

> > The point is, that, if it is a standard "works for dummies" spreadsheet
> > (which I'm thinking it is), then no problem. If it's something used in a
> > professional capacity, such as a Real Estate business that puts
everything
> > into Excel workbooks,
>
> I'd have thought that theyd want something more reliable ?
> Perhaps its ok for those Real Estate firms with less than 20 clients.

If you'd worked in the windows world, as you soooo like to claim, you would
have without a doubt run into a business looking to convert huge
spreadsheets to either RDMS or custom solutions with C\S solution. This is
very common, and a very frequent form of income for windows programmers with
database experience.

> > then forget it. You're not doing your Advocacy any
> > favors
>
> Don't advise anyone about Linux Advocacy Ubertroll, you're only
> qualified to rant about Windos advocacy.

That's just it LinPert, I don't advocate windows at all. I only point out
the rampant BS people here will perpetuate in order to do God knows what in
the name of "advocacy"

> > by perpetuating this sort of blatant BS.
>
> You're the bs expert Ubertroll.

To use one of yours ... pot, kettle ...

> > Just tell it like it is:
>
> Hahahha, why..... ?
> You don't have the aptitude to follow.

I don't do battles of wits with the unarmed.

> > Corel for Linux will handle the importing of  MS office files if said
files
> > don't include any of the more advanced features of that software.
>
> Or any of its unreliability.

Corel is no more or less stable than Office.

> > Your
> > manure is getting thick,
>
> Mr black Uberkettle.
>
> > as is your lack of knowledge on concepts such as
> > OLE.
>
> He demonstrated no lack of knowledge of OLE, you're the one
> making these claims.
>
> We are still waiting for someone to explain the so-called
> features that MS Office has that Wordperfect hasn't.
>
> You may consider OLE to be a feature, is that your point ?

I thought so at one time. The point is, that, the originator of this post
was talking through his hat, got called on it, and resorted to the usual
LinPert retort --Attack dog tactics that only prove what everyone already
knows about COLA.




------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ray Fischer)
Crossposted-To: soc.men,soc.singles,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Why Linux Is no threat to Windows domination of the desktop
Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 21:06:59 GMT

Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Ray Fischer wrote:
>> Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >Edward Rosten wrote:

>> >> > And where is your evidence that people have no choice over their
>> >> > homosexual behavior?
>> >>
>> >> Homosexual people often claim that. For instance Chronos Tachyon claims
>> >> that he had no choice what so ever. I expect there are varying degrees of
>> >> choice avaliable depending on the person. Also, using myself as an
>> >
>> >So, you admit that it's a defect.
>> 
>> Is being black a "defect"? 
>> After all, it too is genetically determined.
>
>Only if having a brain is also a defect, because that's genetically determined, too.

And the answer to the question is what?

>Clue for the clueless: being genetically determined is NOT what defines
>a "defect"

"Defective" means whatever you want.  How long before you herd the
defective people into concentration camps and then ovens?

-- 
Ray Fischer         When you look long into an abyss, the abyss also looks 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  into you  --  Nietzsche

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 14:06:58 -0700
From: Anonymous <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Why Linux Is no threat to Windows domination of the desktop (3/107)
Crossposted-To: soc.men,soc.singles,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

>    premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
>    you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
>    you are lazy, stupid people"
>
>G:  Knackos...you're a retard.
>
>
>F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
>   adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
>
>E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
>   her behavior improves.
>
>D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
>   ...despite (C) above.
> 
>C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
>
>B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
>   method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
>   direction that she doesn't like.
>
>A:  The wise man is mocked by fools.

"Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Ray Fischer wrote:
>> 
>> Rich Soyack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >"Ray Fischer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>> >> Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> >Ray Fischer wrote:
>> 
>> >> >> And where do you suppose the men gets AIDS?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> From women.
>> >> >
>> >> >Bzzzzzzzt! Wrong.
>> >> >There is no transport mechanism for any such infection to happen.
>> >>
>> >> Well, it seems that the United States Centers for Disease Control
>> >> believes otherwise.
>> >>
>> >> But what do they know?  The all-knowing homophobe Kulkis says
>> >> otherwise.
>> >>
>> >> http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pubs/faq/faq21.htm
>> >>
>> >>     Can I get HIV from having vaginal sex?
>> >>
>> >>     Yes, it is possible to become infected with HIV through vaginal
>> >>     intercourse. In fact, it is the most common way the virus is
>> >>     transmitted in much of the world.  HIV can be found in the blood,
>> >>     semen, pre-seminal fluid, or vaginal fluid of a person infected
>> >>     with the virus. The lining of the vagina can tear and possibly
>> >>     allow HIV to enter the body.  Direct absorption of HIV through
>> >>     the mucous membranes that line the vagina also is a possibility.
>> >>
>> >>     The male may be at less risk for HIV transmission than the female
>> >>     through vaginal intercourse. However, HIV can enter the body of the
>> >>     male through his urethra (the opening at the tip of the penis) or
>> >>     through small cuts or open sores on the penis.
>> >
>> >What was left out of this statement was the fact the there would have to
>> >be vaginal lessions for the AIDS virsus to be effectively transmitted to the
>> >male in vaginal intercourse.
>> 
>> Indeed?  So you too know better than the US CDC and all of those
>> medical researchers?   A woman needs a vaginal lesion in order
>> to lubricate.  Another thing I never knew.
>
>Spot the heterophobe
>
>
>> 
>> --
>> Ray Fischer         When you look long into an abyss, the abyss also looks
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]  into you  --  Nietzsche
>
>
>-- 
>Aaron R. Kulkis
>Unix Systems Engineer
>DNRC Minister of all I survey
>ICQ # 3056642
>
>L: This seems to have reduced my spam. Maybe if everyone does it we
>   can defeat the email search bots.  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>K: Truth in advertising:
>        Left Wing Extremists Charles Schumer and Donna Shalala,
>        Black Seperatist Anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan,
>        Special Interest Sierra Club,
>        Anarchist Members of the ACLU
>        Left Wing Corporate Extremist Ted Turner
>        The Drunken Woman Killer Ted Kennedy
>        Grass Roots Pro-Gun movement,
>
>
>J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
>   The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
>   also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
>
>I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
>   challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
>   between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
>   Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
>
>H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
>    premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
>    you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
>    you are lazy, stupid people"
>
>G:  Knackos...you're a retard.
>
>
>F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
>   adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
>
>E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
>   her behavior improves.
>
>D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
>   ...despite (C) above.
> 
>C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
>
>B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
>   method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
>   direction that she doesn't like.
>
>A:  The wise man is mocked by fools.

"Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Ray Fischer wrote:
>> 
>> Rich Soyack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >"Ray Fischer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>> >> Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> >Ray Fischer wrote:
>> 
>> >> >> And where do you suppose the men gets AIDS?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> From women.
>> >> >
>> >> >Bzzzzzzzt! Wrong.
>> >> >There is no transport mechanism for any such infection to happen.
>> >>
>> >> Well, it seems that the United States Centers for Disease Control
>> >> believes otherwise.
>> >>
>> >> But what do they know?  The all-knowing homophobe Kulkis says
>> >> otherwise.
>> >>
>> >> http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pubs/faq/faq21.htm
>> >>
>> >>     Can I get HIV from having vaginal sex?
>> >>
>> >>     Yes, it is possible to become infected with HIV through vaginal
>> >>     intercourse. In fact, it is the most common way the virus is
>> >>     transmitted in much of the world.  HIV can be found in the blood,
>> >>     semen, pre-seminal fluid, or vaginal fluid of a person infected
>> >>     with the virus. The lining of the vagina can tear and possibly
>> >>     allow HIV to enter the body.  Direct absorption of HIV through
>> >>     the mucous membranes that line the vagina also is a possibility.
>> >>
>> >>     The male may be at less risk for HIV transmission than the female
>> >>     through vaginal intercourse. However, HIV can enter the body of the
>> >>     male through his urethra (the opening at the tip of the penis) or
>> >>     through small cuts or open sores on the penis.
>> >
>> >What was left out of this statement was the fact the there would have to
>> >be vaginal lessions for the AIDS virsus to be effectively transmitted to the
>> >male in vaginal intercourse.
>> 
>> Indeed?  So you too know better than the US CDC and all of those
>> medical researchers?   A woman needs a vaginal lesion in order
>> to lubricate.  Another thing I never knew.
>
>Spot the heterophobe
>
>
>> 
>> --
>> Ray Fischer         When you look long into an abyss, the abyss also looks
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]  into you  --  Nietzsche
>
>
>-- 
>Aaron R. Kulkis
>Unix Systems Engineer
>DNRC Minister of all I survey
>ICQ # 3056642
>
>L: This seems to have reduced my spam. Maybe if everyone does it we
>   can defeat the email search bots.  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>K: Truth in advertising:
>        Left Wing Extremists Charles Schumer and Donna Shalala,
>        Black Seperatist Anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan,
>        Special Interest Sierra Club,
>        Anarchist Members of the ACLU
>        Left Wing Corporate Extremist Ted Turner
>        The Drunken Woman Killer Ted Kennedy
>        Grass Roots Pro-Gun movement,
>
>
>J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
>   The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
>   also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
>
>I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
>   challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
>   between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
>   Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
>
>H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
>    premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
>    you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
>    you are lazy, stupid people"
>
>G:  Knackos...you're a retard.
>
>
>F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
>   adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
>
>E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
>   her behavior improves.
>
>D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
>   ...despite (C) above.
> 
>C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
>
>B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
>   method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
>   direction that she doesn't like.
>
>A:  The wise man is mocked by fools.

"Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Ray Fischer wrote:
>> 
>> Rich Soyack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >"Ray Fischer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>> >> Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> >Ray Fischer wrote:
>> 
>> >> >> And where do you suppose the men gets AIDS?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> From women.
>> >> >
>> >> >Bzzzzzzzt! Wrong.
>> >> >There is no transport mechanism for any such infection to happen.
>> >>
>> >> Well, it seems that the United States Centers for Disease Control
>> >> believes otherwise.
>> >>
>> >> But what do they know?  The all-knowing homophobe Kulkis says
>> >> otherwise.
>> >>
>> >> http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pubs/faq/faq21.htm
>> >>
>> >>     Can I get HIV from having vaginal sex?
>> >>
>> >>     Yes, it is possible to become infected with HIV through vaginal
>> >>     intercourse. In fact, it is the most common way the virus is




































































































































































































































































------------------------------


** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **

The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can send mail to the entire list by posting to comp.os.linux.advocacy.

Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
    ftp.funet.fi                                pub/Linux
    tsx-11.mit.edu                              pub/linux
    sunsite.unc.edu                             pub/Linux

End of Linux-Advocacy Digest
******************************

Reply via email to