Setting si_code to 0 is the same as setting si_code to SI_USER.  This
is the same si_code as SI_USER.  Posix and common sense requires that
SI_USER not be a signal specific si_code.  As such this use of 0 for
the si_code is a pretty horribly broken ABI.

Cc: Helge Deller <[email protected]>
Cc: Richard Henderson <[email protected]>
Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <[email protected]>
Cc: Matt Turner <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
History Tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tglx/history.git
Ref: 0a635c7a84cf ("Fill in siginfo_t.")
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <[email protected]>
---
 arch/alpha/kernel/osf_sys.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/alpha/kernel/osf_sys.c b/arch/alpha/kernel/osf_sys.c
index 89faa6f4de47..2e02aef5a334 100644
--- a/arch/alpha/kernel/osf_sys.c
+++ b/arch/alpha/kernel/osf_sys.c
@@ -872,7 +872,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(osf_setsysinfo, unsigned long, op, void 
__user *, buffer,
                fex = (exc >> IEEE_STATUS_TO_EXCSUM_SHIFT) & swcr;
                if (fex) {
                        siginfo_t info;
-                       int si_code = 0;
+                       int si_code = FPE_FIXME;
 
                        if (fex & IEEE_TRAP_ENABLE_DNO) si_code = FPE_FLTUND;
                        if (fex & IEEE_TRAP_ENABLE_INE) si_code = FPE_FLTRES;
-- 
2.14.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-alpha" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to