On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 12:27:57PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> I just looked at Alpha's atomic_dec_and_lock assembly and did something
> that should work for atomic_dec_and_lock_irqsave. I think it works but I
> would prefer for someone from the Alpha-Camp to ack this before it goes
> in. It is not critical because the non-optimized version should work.
I would vote to simply delete this entire file and get alpha on the
generic code.
Afaict, this asm gets the ordering wrong, and I doubt it is much faster
than using atomic_add_unless() in any case (+- the ordering of course).
> arch/alpha/lib/dec_and_lock.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/alpha/lib/dec_and_lock.c b/arch/alpha/lib/dec_and_lock.c
> index 069fef7372dc..d29ba1de4f68 100644
> --- a/arch/alpha/lib/dec_and_lock.c
> +++ b/arch/alpha/lib/dec_and_lock.c
> @@ -32,6 +32,28 @@ _atomic_dec_and_lock: \n\
> .previous \n\
> .end _atomic_dec_and_lock");
>
> + asm (".text \n\
> + .global _atomic_dec_and_lock_irqsave \n\
> + .ent _atomic_dec_and_lock_irqsave \n\
> + .align 4 \n\
> +_atomic_dec_and_lock_irqsave: \n\
> + .prologue 0 \n\
> +1: ldl_l $1, 0($16) \n\
> + subl $1, 1, $1 \n\
> + beq $1, 2f \n\
> + stl_c $1, 0($16) \n\
> + beq $1, 4f \n\
> + mb \n\
> + clr $0 \n\
> + ret \n\
> +2: br $29, 3f \n\
> +3: ldgp $29, 0($29) \n\
> + br $atomic_dec_and_lock_irqsave1..ng \n\
> + .subsection 2 \n\
> +4: br 1b \n\
> + .previous \n\
> + .end _atomic_dec_and_lock_irqsave");
> +
> static int __used atomic_dec_and_lock_1(atomic_t *atomic, spinlock_t *lock)
> {
> /* Slow path */
> @@ -43,14 +65,11 @@ static int __used atomic_dec_and_lock_1(atomic_t *atomic,
> spinlock_t *lock)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(_atomic_dec_and_lock);
>
> -int _atomic_dec_and_lock_irqsave(atomic_t *atomic, spinlock_t *lock,
> - unsigned long *flags)
> +static int __used atomic_dec_and_lock_irqsave1(atomic_t *atomic,
> + spinlock_t *lock,
> + unsigned long *flags)
> {
> - /* Subtract 1 from counter unless that drops it to 0 (ie. it was 1) */
> - if (atomic_add_unless(atomic, -1, 1))
> - return 0;
> -
> - /* Otherwise do it the slow way */
> + /* Slow way */
> spin_lock_irqsave(lock, *flags);
> if (atomic_dec_and_test(atomic))
> return 1;
> --
> 2.17.1
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-alpha" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
