On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 02:22:43PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> (+cc: some possible relevant people)
> Hi,
>
> Guillem Jover wrote:
>
> > On BSD systems __unused has traditionally been defined to mean the
> > equivalent of gcc's __attribute__((__unused__)), some parts of the
> > Linux tree use that convention too (e.g. perf). The problem comes when
> > defining such macro while trying to build unmodified source code with
> > BSD origins on systems with Linux headers.
> >
> > Rename the user visible struct members from __unused to __unused0 to
> > not cause compilation failures due to that macro, which should not be
> > a problem as those members are supposed to be private anyway.
^__ is reserved for libc internal stuff and there is no reason to
name the unused/padding members "__unused".
So one or a set of patches that rename them all to something more
sensible would be fine.
Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
