[email protected] wrote:

> Was this an intentional overload of 139 (and so on for other archs)?  Just
> checking - I'm sure if it goes in like this, we'll see a patch to "fix" the
> collision for 3.16.0 or so... ;)

Ummm...  Odd...  I'm surprised StGIT managed to reapply my patches with no
warning.  I'll fix the numbering in them.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to