From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 13:16:44 -0600

> David Miller <[email protected]> writes:
> 
>> From: [email protected]
>> Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 10:53:10 -0800
>>
>>> It's not a "slippery slope"; it's been our standard practice for ages.
>>
>> We've never put an entire class of generic system calls behind
>> a config option.
> 
> CONFIG_SYSVIPC has been in the kernel as long as I can remember.
> 
> I seem to remember a plan to remove that code once userspace had
> finished migrating to more unixy interfaces to ipc.  But in 20 years
> that migration does does not seem to have finished, or even look
> like it ever will.
> 
> But if we started a slippery slope it was long long ago.

Fair enough.

Would be amusing if these tiny systems have it enabled.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to