On 05/02/2015 04:54, Weiny, Ira wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 09:50:38PM +0100, Yann Droneaud wrote: >> >>> Anyway, I recognize that uverb way of abusing write() syscall is >>> borderline (at best) regarding other Linux subsystems and Unix >>> paradigm in general. But it's not enough to screw it more. >> >> Then we must return the correct output size explicitly in the struct. > > I was thinking this very same thing as I read through this thread. > > I too would like to avoid the use of comp_masks if at all possible. The > query call seems to be a verb where the structure size is all you really need > to know the set of values returned. > > As Jason says, other calls may require the comp_mask where 0 is not > sufficient to indicate "missing".
Would it be okay to return it in the ib_uverbs_cmd_hdr.out_words? That would further abuse the write() syscall by writing to the input buffer. However, the only other alternative I see is to add it explicitly to every uverb response struct. Haggai -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
