On 09/25, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
>
> +struct ns_common *proc_ns_fdget(int fd, int nstype, struct fd *fd_ref)
> {
> - struct file *file;
> + struct ns_common *ns;
> + struct fd f;
>
> - file = fget(fd);
> - if (!file)
> + f = fdget(fd);
> + if (!f.file)
> return ERR_PTR(-EBADF);
>
> - if (file->f_op != &ns_file_operations)
> + if (f.file->f_op != &ns_file_operations)
> + goto out_invalid;
> +
> + ns = get_proc_ns(file_inode(f.file));
> + if (nstype && (ns->ops->type != nstype))
> goto out_invalid;
>
> - return file;
> + *fd_ref = f;
> + return ns;
>
> out_invalid:
> - fput(file);
> + fdput(f);
> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> }
Well yes, fdget() makes sense but this is minor.
Honestly, I do not really like the new helper... I understand this
is subjective, so I won't insist. But how about 1/1? We do not need
fd/file at all. With this patch your sys_getvpid() can just use
proc_get_ns_by_fd(fd, CLONE_NEWPID) and put_pid_ns().
Eric, what do you think?
See also "TODO" in the changelog.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
