On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 09:49:37AM -0700, Shaohua Li wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 04:01:37PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > +static int madvise_free_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
> > +                           unsigned long end, struct mm_walk *walk)
> > +
> > +{
> > +   struct mmu_gather *tlb = walk->private;
> > +   struct mm_struct *mm = tlb->mm;
> > +   struct vm_area_struct *vma = walk->vma;
> > +   spinlock_t *ptl;
> > +   pte_t *pte, ptent;
> > +   struct page *page;
> > +
> > +   split_huge_page_pmd(vma, addr, pmd);
> > +   if (pmd_trans_unstable(pmd))
> > +           return 0;
> > +
> > +   pte = pte_offset_map_lock(mm, pmd, addr, &ptl);
> > +   arch_enter_lazy_mmu_mode();
> > +   for (; addr != end; pte++, addr += PAGE_SIZE) {
> > +           ptent = *pte;
> > +
> > +           if (!pte_present(ptent))
> > +                   continue;
> > +
> > +           page = vm_normal_page(vma, addr, ptent);
> > +           if (!page)
> > +                   continue;
> > +
> > +           if (PageSwapCache(page)) {
> > +                   if (!trylock_page(page))
> > +                           continue;
> > +
> > +                   if (!try_to_free_swap(page)) {
> > +                           unlock_page(page);
> > +                           continue;
> > +                   }
> > +
> > +                   ClearPageDirty(page);
> > +                   unlock_page(page);
> > +           }
> > +
> > +           /*
> > +            * Some of architecture(ex, PPC) don't update TLB
> > +            * with set_pte_at and tlb_remove_tlb_entry so for
> > +            * the portability, remap the pte with old|clean
> > +            * after pte clearing.
> > +            */
> > +           ptent = ptep_get_and_clear_full(mm, addr, pte,
> > +                                           tlb->fullmm);
> > +           ptent = pte_mkold(ptent);
> > +           ptent = pte_mkclean(ptent);
> > +           set_pte_at(mm, addr, pte, ptent);
> > +           tlb_remove_tlb_entry(tlb, pte, addr);
> 
> The orginal ptent might not be dirty. In that case, the tlb_remove_tlb_entry
> is unnecessary, so please add a check. In practice, I saw more TLB flush with
> FREE compared to DONTNEED because of this issue.

Actually, it was my TODO but I forgot it. :(
I fixed for new version.
Thanks for the pointing out.

> 
> Thanks,
> Shaohua
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to