On Sat, 31 Oct 2015, Ben Hutchings wrote:

> If we need to increase the number of huge pages, drop caches first
> to reduce fragmentation and then check that we actually allocated
> as many as we wanted.  Retry once if that doesn't work.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk>
> ---
> The test always fails for me in a 1 GB VM without this.
> 
> Ben.
> 
>  tools/testing/selftests/vm/run_vmtests | 15 ++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/run_vmtests 
> b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/run_vmtests
> index 9179ce8..97ed1b2 100755
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/run_vmtests
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/run_vmtests
> @@ -20,13 +20,26 @@ done < /proc/meminfo
>  if [ -n "$freepgs" ] && [ -n "$pgsize" ]; then
>       nr_hugepgs=`cat /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages`
>       needpgs=`expr $needmem / $pgsize`
> -     if [ $freepgs -lt $needpgs ]; then
> +     tries=2
> +     while [ $tries -gt 0 ] && [ $freepgs -lt $needpgs ]; do
>               lackpgs=$(( $needpgs - $freepgs ))
> +             echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
>               echo $(( $lackpgs + $nr_hugepgs )) > /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages
>               if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
>                       echo "Please run this test as root"
>                       exit 1
>               fi
> +             while read name size unit; do
> +                     if [ "$name" = "HugePages_Free:" ]; then
> +                             freepgs=$size
> +                     fi
> +             done < /proc/meminfo
> +             tries=$((tries - 1))
> +     done
> +     if [ $freepgs -lt $needpgs ]; then
> +             printf "Not enough huge pages available (%d < %d)\n" \
> +                    $freepgs $needpgs
> +             exit 1
>       fi
>  else
>       echo "no hugetlbfs support in kernel?"
> 

I know this patch is in -mm and hasn't been merged by Linus yet, but I'm 
wondering why the multiple /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches is helping?  Would it 
simply suffice to put a sleep in there instead or is drop_caches actually 
doing something useful a second time around?

Reply via email to