Nick Piggin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > There seems to be quite a bit of confusion and possible problems > in the cpu_idle code of many architectures.
Can we keep Chris and Ingo on cc please?
- Lots of possible arch breakage in cpu_idle!! Nick Piggin
- Re: Lots of possible arch breakage in cpu_idle!... Andrew Morton
- Re: Lots of possible arch breakage in cpu_idle!... William Lee Irwin III
- Re: Lots of possible arch breakage in cpu_i... Nick Piggin
- Re: Lots of possible arch breakage in c... William Lee Irwin III
- Re: Lots of possible arch breakage ... William Lee Irwin III
- Re: Lots of possible arch breakage in cpu_idle!... William Lee Irwin III
- Re: Lots of possible arch breakage in cpu_i... Nick Piggin
- Re: Lots of possible arch breakage in c... William Lee Irwin III
- Re: Lots of possible arch breakage in cpu_idle!... Richard Henderson
- Re: Lots of possible arch breakage in cpu_i... David S. Miller
- Re: Lots of possible arch breakage in c... Richard Henderson
