Andy Whitcroft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 02:13:52AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > >>Could I ask the arch maintainers to review the `sparsemem' patches from -mm, > >>please, if you haven't done so... > >> > >>They're all in http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/sparsemem/ > > > > > > Pretty confusing. All kinds of options added, removed, modified, put > > back ... let's merge it, then see how it looks. Maybe we'll switch > > parisc from discontigmem to sparsemem. > > Would it make sense for me to take the current pile of patches in -mm > and merge the fixes into the appropriate main patches to make a > consolidated patch set? If we want to do that I am happy to put the > effort in.
I've already done some of that, but I need to do another pass. <looks> The patches I have there seem fairly logical, although there's a lot of Kconfig futzing going on. Do you spy any patches which should be collapsed together there? If so, which?
