On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 01:28:57AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > On Fri, 1 Jul 2005 00:38:06 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Like below? I am not sure that this is better as we duplicate the code > > that selects the write_func ... > > This is seeming like a lot of infrastructure change (I did the read > version as well) for a single (badly done) API. How about we go with > is_compat_syscall() for 2.6.13 and revisit the VFS changes after that?
Please just do the infrastructure change. If we start with hacks they will never come out again. -Andi
