On Maw, 2005-12-13 at 13:32 +0000, David Howells wrote: > > Its then obvious what it does, you don't randomly break other drivers you've > > not reviewed and the interface is intuitive rather than obfuscated. > > I've attempted to review everything in 2.6.15-rc5 outside of most of the > archs. > I can't easily modify any driver not contained in that tarball, but at least > the compiler will barf and force a review.
Is there a reason you didnt answer the comment about down/up being the usual way computing refers to the operations on counting semaphores but just deleted it ?
