Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation

Andrew Morton Wed, 14 Dec 2005 03:36:32 -0800

Could someone please remind me why we're even discussing this, given that
mutex_down() is slightly more costly than current down(), and mutex_up() is
appreciably more costly than current up()?

Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementa... David Howells
- Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex imple... Miles Bader
Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementa... David Howells
- Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex imple... Ingo Molnar
- Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex imple... Alan Cox
- - Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex i... Arjan van de Ven
  - - Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mut... Arjan van de Ven
    - Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mut... Alan Cox
    - - Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple... Arjan van de Ven
      - Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce s... Alan Cox
        
        Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce s... Andrew Morton
        
        Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce s... Arjan van de Ven
        
        Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce s... Andi Kleen
        
        Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce s... Arjan van de Ven
        
        Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce s... David Howells
        
        Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce s... Jakub Jelinek
        
        Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce s... Nick Piggin
        
        Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce s... David Howells
        
        Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce s... Nick Piggin
        
        Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce s... Russell King
        
        Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce s... Nick Piggin

Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation

Reply via email to