Andrew Morton wrote:
"Luck, Tony" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Various new syscalls which are trickling their way Linuswards and will need
testing and wiring up once they get there:
Are there test-suites for any/all of these new calls?
That's an excellent point.
Guys, architecture maintainers need test suites to verify that the syscalls
actually work as they wire them up. Please share. A stable URL would be
preferred - something which can go into the changlog or conceivably into
the kernel source.
Thanks.
Hi Andrew,
I apologize for not sending out the unshare test program by Friday as I had
promised. I got distracted with a strange problem with rmdir. Steve Grubb
first noticed it while testing the pam module that uses unshare. I was
able to
reproduce the problem with one of my unshare testcases as well. Initially
I suspected the unshare code, however the problem appears to be in the
base code. I am doing some additional debugging now, so I can narrow
down the release/patch that introduced the problem. Once I gather useful
information, I will email Ram Pai and Al Viro with the appropriate
information (hopefully by tonight) and a small test program that can
reproduce the problem. My new ETA for unshare test is by tomorrow
night.
Thanks.
-Janak
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
