On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 10:10:02AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > I assume that the values are different on different architectures > because of legacy/backward compatibility concerns, but I dont see > compelling reasons to mess up new values. > Why is it important to keep the MADV_ numbers densely packed? We have 32 bit > for these, dont we?
Efficiency. GCC does much better with densely packed numbers in a switch statement. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
