On Sunday 20 August 2006 13:25, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Sun, 20 Aug 2006 12:36:49 -0500 > > Chase Venters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Unless 'errno' has some significant reason to live on in the kernel, I > > think it would be better to kill it and write kernel syscall macros that > > don't muck with it. > > We have been working in that direction. It's certainly something we'd like > to kill off.
Perhaps Arnd's patch is a good step in that direction then. A secondary suggestion is to put a big comment there that explains "Yes, we know this is ugly, it's going to die soon." I'd also consider going so far as just returning -1 if we failed, since we can't quite trust errno anyway. Thanks, Chase - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
