On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 22:17:48 +0000 Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 03:11:00PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Subject: move die notifier handling to common code > > From: Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > This patch moves the die notifier handling to common code. Previous > > various architectures had exactly the same code for it. Note that the new > > code is compiled unconditionally, this should be understood as an appel to > > the other architecture maintainer to implement support for it aswell (aka > > sprinkling a notify_die or two in the proper place) > > > > arm had a notifiy_die that did something totally different, I renamed it to > > arm_notify_die as part of the patch and made it static to the file it's > > declared and used at. avr32 used to pass slightly less information through > > this interface and I brought it into line with the other architectures. > > > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Cc: <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org> > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > NAK. This will, as seems to be the current favourite past time, break > ARM. A simple grep command will show why; I leave it as an exercise for > those to run this command to discover the details. > > $ grep notify_die arch/arm -r There seems to be one missed conversion in arch/arm/mm/fault.c:do_DataAbort(). If that's not what you mean then perhaps you can give us another hint. I'm not presently cross-building ARM due to utrace. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
