On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 10:06:58PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:

> > > > > Ok, output on parisc is:
> > > > > 
> > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ./a.out
> > > > > firstfirstfirst
> > > > > firstfirstfirst
> > > > > secondsecondsec
> > > > > 
> > > > > Which is correct.  It remains correct even if I drop the msync().
> > > > 
> > > > With Lennert's new program, I get mostly:
> > > > 
> > > > firstfirstfirst
> > > > firstfirstfirst
> > > > firstfirstfirst
> > > > 
> > > > but occasionally:
> > > > 
> > > > firstfirstfirst
> > > > firstfirstfirst
> > > > secondsecondsec
> > > > 
> > > > However, if I open code the memcpy() in the MAPREAD to copy one word
> > > > at a time, then I reliably get the "secondsecondsec" line.  But if I
> > > > convert the memcpy() in MAPWRITE in the same way, I'm back to mostly
> > > > getting the failure with the occasional success.  Utterly confused.
> > > > 
> > > > Unless someone's got a theory, I'm stumped.
> > > 
> > > I think you're not flushing correctly in munmap() ... but I'm not sure
> > > the linux API actually requires this.
> > 
> > Having to (conditionally) invalidate the kernel direct mapping for
> > every userland page we unmap would kind of suck..
> 
> Lets just verify it is a stale kernel mapping first.  Try this patch:
> it will cohere the kernel aliases but not the user ones,

Hmm.  I don't understand what you're saying.

By the time we call the final read(2) (which is what returns the
stale data), there _are_ no user mappings of the page in question.

Flushing the kernel direct mapping by unconditionally calling
flush_dcache_page() in do_generic_mapping_read() makes the issue go
away and makes fsx-linux happy.

Flushing the kernel direct mapping by forcibly context switching
between munmap() and read() (VIVT cache, context switch does full
cache flush+invalidate) makes the issue go away, too.  
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to