David Woodhouse writes: > Pants.
Ah. Is that a naughty word in the UK? If so I'll have to remember that when I go to kernel summit. :) > It doesn't work because the 'flags' argument ends up in r9, and > we can only use r3-r8 for syscall arguments. We'll need to do it the > same way as ARM does, with the flags as the second argument. Yes. We'll need a wrapper for both 32-bit and for 32-on-64. > Or is it? Can we ditch sys_sync_file_range now and implement a new > sys_sync_file_range2 with the two 32-bit arguments first? Would be nice... Paul. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
