On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 15:54:25 -0700 (PDT) Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Jul 2007, Luck, Tony wrote: > > > > How many tests were done and on what platform? > > > > Andy's part 0/7 post starts off with the performance numbers. He > > didn't say which ia64 platform was used for the tests. > > > > Looking my logs for the last few kernel builds (some built on a > > tiger_defconfig kernel which uses CONFIG_VIRTUAL_MEM_MAP=y, and > > some with the new CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP) I'd have a tough time > > saying whether there was a regression or not). > > I'd be very surprised if there is any difference because the IA64 code for > virtual memmap is the source of ideas and implementation for SPARSE_VIRTUAL. > Maybe pfn_valid() implementation is different from ? Thanks, -Kame - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
