On Sat, 14 Jul 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > #elif defined(CONFIG_SPARSEMEM)
>
> nice ifdef mess you have here. and an sm-generic file should be something
> truely generic instead of a complete ifdef forest. I think we'd be
> much better off duplicating the two lines above in architectures using
> it anyway.
Nope these all need to be arch independent otherwise we cannot consolidate
the code. True these statements became very small with SPARSE_VIRTUAL but
that is no reason to make an exception just for this new model.
> > +#ifndef CONFIG_ARCH_POPULATES_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP
> > +void __meminit vmemmap_verify(pte_t *pte, int node,
> > + unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
> > +{
> > + unsigned long pfn = pte_pfn(*pte);
> > + int actual_node = early_pfn_to_nid(pfn);
> > +
> > + if (actual_node != node)
> > + printk(KERN_WARNING "[%lx-%lx] potential offnode "
> > + "page_structs\n", start, end - 1);
> > +}
>
> Given tht this function is a tiny noop please just put them into the
> arch dir for !CONFIG_ARCH_POPULATES_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP architectures
> and save yourself both the ifdef mess and the config option.
Then its no longer generic. You are ripping the basic framework of
sparsemem apart.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
