On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 01:57:10PM +0100, James Bottomley wrote: > On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 06:42 -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 12:56:16PM +0100, Ralf Baechle wrote: > > > Most architectures implement the dma_cache_wback, dma_cache_wback_inv > > > and dma_cache_wback_inv functions even though there is the more modern > > > and much better designed DMA API and only two MIPS-specific users (one of > > > which I just fixed) do remain. So should we finally start removing it? > > > > There's still some users in arch/, but yes, let's remove it from the > > arches that don't use it internally. > > There's the updated dma_cache_sync() API, which you need to keep because > the parisc lasi scsi and network drivers rely on it for our fully > incoherent boxes.
I wasn't thinking of touching dma_cache_sync, only the three mentioned mostly unused ones. Ralf - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
