On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Daniel Walker <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 13:01 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote: >> On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 12:49:55 -0800 >> Daniel Walker <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 12:44 -0800, Dima Zavin wrote: >> > > Really though? Let's look at one of them: >> > > >> > >> > > 2 Arve Hjønnevåg <[email protected]> >> > > 6 Brian Swetland <[email protected]> >> > > 14 Dima Zavin <[email protected]> >> > > 2 Haley Teng <[email protected]> >> > > 1 Iliyan Malchev <[email protected]> >> > > 5 Mike Chan <[email protected]> >> > >> > I'll add this list into the commit text .. >> >> Sounds like a good example of a patch where you should preserve the >> author field as well. > > preserve it as who ?
My main point is that the authorship of this code is VERY easy to ascertain. It is not like a lot of other vendor code that gets thrown over the wall as a tarball. We really do our best to follow the right practices, give the right credits, create legible well separated commits, etc. --Dima -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
