On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 06:20:10AM +0900, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 09:08:15AM -0700, David Collins wrote:
> > I agree that it would be beneficial to change regulator_dev.supply from > > type struct regulator_dev * to type struct regulator *. However, I think > > that going that route will be a major undertaking with a lot of details to > Hrm, it doesn't look too bad - as far as I can see it should just be > fairly direct refactorings of each of get, put, enable and disable? I had a look at this, it all looks very straightforward apart from get where we need to either do a dance to set up a supply mapping or restructure to expose the core get operation internally without map lookups (the latter I think) and that doesn't seem terribly invasive. I may actually try coding it up next time I'm sitting in front of an appropriate test system. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
