Neil,

On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 22:04 +0100, Neil Leeder wrote:
> Any opinions on what would be the best thing to do here? Choices appear to be:
> 
> 1) allow the relative include path of ../vfp/vfpinstr.h
> 2) move the definitions of fmrx, fmxr from vfp/vfpinstr.h to include/asm/vfp.h
> 3) move vfp/vfpinstr.h to include/asm
> 4) other...?
> 
> If it helps, I can create a patch for whichever is considered the preferred 
> solution.
> 

I personally don't find option (1) that offensive - Bryan seemed to
differ though so perhaps option (2) would keep him happy?

I don't think option (3) is sensible given that the majority of the
header file is private to /vfp.

Will

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to