On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 03:51:16PM +0200, Tanya Brokhman wrote: > Hi Greg > > As you know we've posted our implementation of SuperSpeed support for the > Gadget Framework. It's been released some time ago and we addressed most of > the comments we got with new versions. We're holding the latest fixes for > Felipe Balbi comments since we're waiting for more inputs. We were wondering > if there anything else we can do to help this code be mainlined into the > kernel.
Keep releasing the patches, after splitting them up and addressing the comments that people have made about them. > We know it's being used since several developers addressed us (in private) > with questions on the setup. Also, our implementation of the UAS Gadget > driver relies on this code. Note, you and Felipe are going to have to work together to agree on what is the best solution here, we can't have two different implementations, so I am going to rely on the both of you working to resolve the differences. When that happens, please let us know, and feel free to hash out these details on the mailing list so that everyone can help out. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
