Hi Felipe
> > > ---
> > > -*/
> > >
> > > static struct usb_gadget_driver composite_driver = {
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_USB_GADGET_SUPERSPEED
> > > + .speed = USB_SPEE_SUPER,
> > > +#else
> > > .speed = USB_SPEED_HIGH,
> > > +#endif
> > >
> > > .unbind = composite_unbind,
> > >
> >
> > I have no problem updating static struct usb_gadget_driver
> > composite_driver as you suggested but it seems the same as updating
> it
> > @ usb_composite_probe()...
>
> still, you will have two places poking at the same field. It's better
> to keep it at once, update only that and we will take your approach.
>
Ok so just to make sure I understand you correctly:
You want me to remove the modification made to usb_composite_probe() and
instead add:
static struct usb_gadget_driver composite_driver = {
+#ifdef CONFIG_USB_GADGET_SUPERSPEED
+ .speed = USB_SPEE_SUPER,
+#else
.speed = USB_SPEED_HIGH,
+#endif
.unbind = composite_unbind,
And then you'll be ok with change? Or is there anything else?
If this is it then I'm relieved :) and of course will update the code.
Best regards,
Tanya Brokhman
Consultant for Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
