On 24/02/12 17:09, David Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 10:11:14AM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On 22/02/12 21:55, David Brown wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 05:39:37PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>>> Now that sched_clock is mandatory on ARM it's simple to add
>>>> sched_clock support to the MSM timer code. Add it so that we get
>>>> more accurate sched_clock output than the jiffies based version
>>>> that's provided by default.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
>>>> Cc: Marc Zyngier <[email protected]>
>>>> Cc: David Brown <[email protected]>
>>>
>>> Marc, are you able to pull this into your series, so they can all go
>>> in together? If so:
>>>
>>> Acked-by: David Brown <[email protected]>
>>
>> David, Stephen,
>>
>> Russell already pulled my sched_clock() patch series, so I'm not sure it
>> is actually useful for me to carry it (and there is actually no
>> dependency between this patch and the series). Maybe putting it in the
>> patch system or via armsoc would be best?
>>
>> Otherwise:
>> Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <[email protected]>
>
> I'll keep an eye on it then, and push it into the ARM soc tree when
> the dependencies are there.
The whole thing is that there's no dependency. The sched_clock() stuff
has hit mainline during the merge window. This patch could go in right
now, without any harm.
What Russell pulled is just a cleanup to convert the last two platforms
having their own sched_clock() and not relying on our framework.
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
