On Sep 12, 2013, at 12:06 PM, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Kumar Gala <ga...@codeaurora.org> wrote: >> >> On Sep 12, 2013, at 11:46 AM, Olof Johansson wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Kumar Gala <ga...@codeaurora.org> wrote: >>>> Use the Qualcomm vendor prefix (qcom) as the directory name for >>>> Qualcomm MSM devicetrees going forward. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <ga...@codeaurora.org> >>> >>> Let's not move just one platform like this. If we are to do this, we >>> should move everything, and that will be really painful and needs to >>> be done in a controlled manner, probably scripted and right before a >>> -rc1 or such. >> >> >> Than I suggest we deal with it when we pull the device trees out of the >> kernel tree. >> >> As such, I'd tell Rohit to go forward with the file being named >> apq8074-dragonboard.dtb for the time being. > > My original request to please use a common prefix for your product > families stands. Please prefix with msm-*, or if you have to, qcom-* > instead, since you guys can't seem to make your mind up on standard > prefixes (msm, apq, etc).
This is silly, I dont see the reason to go with qcom-apq<SOC>-<BOARD>.dts and than in the future drop qcom- when we mostly likely shift to a dir structure. As engineers we are all too aware of the lack of sanity in marketing names, but its what we have so we have to live with it. - k -- Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
