On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 05:06:45AM +0000, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 10/28, Mark Rutland wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 12:31:28AM +0000, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > > + > > > +Optional properties: > > > +- interrupt-names: Should contain the interrupt names "l1_irq" and > > > + "l2_irq" > > > > As with my comment on the parsing code, I'd prefer that if interrupt-names > > was > > present it defined the order of interrupts. Otherwise it's redundant and of > > no > > value. > > > > Otherwise, the binding looks fine to me: > > > > Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutl...@arm.com> > > How about I just drop the interrupt-names property? It isn't > adding much and is a holdover from the vendor kernel.
That's also fine given that this is a very specific binding. Mark. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
