On Jan 31, 2014, at 1:34 PM, Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> wrote: > On Friday 31 January 2014 13:25:25 Kumar Gala wrote: >>> The hotplug.c change sticks out as something that isn't just a move >>> of code to another place, but deletion of unused code. It would >>> be nice to split that out into a separate change, possibly together >>> with the trivial board.c and smp.c changes. >> >> That’s not 100% true, the hotplug.c code implemented msm_cpu_die, which >> moved into smp.c >> >> I can split out scm*/smp* into a patch to enable smp if that is really >> desired, but not exactly sure what it gets us. >> > > It's not extremely important, I just prefer splitting patches > that have any kind of functional change from trivial moves. > > If something happens to break for an unforseen reason, it's > easier to bisect to the patch that does the change. > > Arnd
I’ll push my change to hotplug.c into the SMP patch set that Stephen started. - k -- Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
